As the High Court refrains from fining Karnataka ten lakh rupees, it issues one final warning.

Bengaluru:When hearing a petition by the state government against a retired assistant sub-inspector of polices who was acquitted by the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal (KSAT), the High Court of Karnataka stayed short of imposing a fine of Rs 10 lakh, but the court said it was still ending the rant: We are not sure that submitting this letter would help in driving home the message, but it should also be construe However, the KSAT found no evidence against him.Despite this, the state filed a writ petition in the High Court, arguing that what respondent has been told is not a lawsuit but something else.In response to the State's previous warnings, reminders, and orders, the High Court has said that we think it is appropriate to put the state in a cost of Rs 10 lakh to be paid by it, and we also propose to allow the first petitioner-State to conduct an investigation and recover the same from the cop The High Court had said that the Advocate General had provided clear cause to justify the cost of Rs 10 lakhs being refused, and that a research report by the Law Department of Karnataka titled Karnataka State Dispute Resolution Policy was submitted to the court, and that the result of the investigation was the Policy Document, according to the court.The learned Advocate General admitted to the denial of the complaint and noted that the allegations have been split apart in the course of cross examination and from every possible angle His son, an engineer by profession, was a regular worker in Bengaluru.He had some assets even before his service date.

The Enquiry Officer and the Disciplinary Authority have omitted any of these sources of income in the investigation, which the court observed is not an accident but a deliberate omission, according to the High Court.In order to inform everyone about the Policy Document and its implementation, the Law Secretary was asked to conduct workshops for all parties.( )