Delhi High Court wants the NIA's response to the PFI leader's request for medical care.

Delhi High Court orders the National Investigation Agency to publish a status report on the plea for medical attention by E Abubacker of the banned organisation Popular Front of India (PFI) The issue has been listed on the agenda for further investigation on December 14th .

New Delhi, India, November 30: The Delhi High Court ordered the National Investigation Agency (NIA) to publish a status report on the plea for medical attention by leader E Abubacker of the banned organisation Popular Front of India (PFI).He has refused to be put in jail on account of his medical condition.He is the former Chairman of the organization, who was arrested following a national wide investigation.He has filed an appeal in the High Court against the trial court order denying him the right to compensation based on medical grounds.

The issue has been listed on the agenda for further investigation on December 14th.The bench said that the accused would be given the necessary medical attention, but that we are not ready to do so.AIIMS is a premier hospital in the United States.We are not consenting to house arrest if you use this as a pretext.

Abubacker, 70 years old and suffering from cancer and Parkinson's disease, was advised by petitioners counsel Adit Pujari.He is in great pain, according to the counsel, who stated that the petitioner needed urgent medical attention, but that his appeal was dismissed by the lower court.On the other hand, the bench expressed displeasure with the AIIMS's diagnosis and treatment.It is an investigation.It must also wait till 2024, the bench said, adding that it will examine the case for medical attention.

The investigation team said that the police department is not restricting the petitioner's medical care.He also said that the case investigation is ongoing.The bench said, The problem is that the defendant is very ill. We will need to determine whether AIIMS is to be required to establish a medical board and let this court decide which is the right option.

.
.
.
.