SC criticises the Center for Judicial Appointments and requests that it maintain the current legal posture.

Supreme Court expresses surprise at governments retaliation for enacting new law . Court says it must comply with existing law positions .

New Delhi (India) — On Thursday, the Supreme Court expressed surprise at the government's retaliation for enacting a new law but said that it must also comply with existing law positions, according to the bench.The Supreme Court also ruled that the government should not conveniently refer to the opinions of some judges on MoP to oppose Collegium's suggestions.The court said that it was not aware of the special circumstance for which this name was deleted, and that the Attorney General should advise Union Ministers to exercise some control over their public criticism of the Collegium and that the Attorney General's remarks were made incorrectly, and that the ministers should exercise some control.The court also stated that the Memorandum of Procedure (MoP) is not final until government ideas are investigated, and that the MoP as finalized must apply.The Supreme Court cited a previous Constitution Bench decision upholding the Collegium system, saying that the government is legally bound to implement and enforce the statute as set out, but that it does not change the existing legal process.The Supreme Court observed that years later, the name for the judicial appointment was returned, which Collegium again reiterated.This is a kind of infinite war.

Senior Advocate Vikas Singh, representing the petitioner, also said that the law must be followed and express displeasure with the remarks made on Collegium.In the first hearing, the Court expressed dissatisfaction with the Law Minister's speech on the 99th Constitutional Amendment Bill, which opened the door for the creation of the National Judicial Appointment Commission (NJAC), which was eventually over

.
.
.
.